Takes Legal Action Against WhiteHat Jr Over Unpaid Licence Fees

Navigating the Crossroads of EdTech Partnerships: Unraveling the vs. WhiteHat Jr Legal Battle


In a recent legal development, non-profit organization has initiated legal proceedings against WhiteHat Jr, a subsidiary of the edtech giant BYJU’S. The lawsuit, filed in the California district court, alleges a violation of licensing agreements by WhiteHat Jr for failing to meet required fee payments while still utilizing’s educational platform.


The partnership between WhiteHat Jr and was established in 2022, marking a collaboration in the field of coding education. As part of the agreement, WhiteHat Jr committed to paying $4 million over a four-year period to license’s coding education platform.

Violation of Licensing Contract:

According to the lawsuit, WhiteHat Jr stands accused of breaching the licensing contract by not fulfilling the stipulated payment obligations. contends that, despite the commitment made in the partnership agreement, WhiteHat Jr has failed to meet the financial terms outlined for the use of’s platform.

Legal Action in California District Court:

The legal action has been initiated in the California district court, where seeks resolution and compensation for the alleged breach of contract. The lawsuit reflects the non-profit organization’s commitment to upholding the terms of agreements and ensuring fair compensation for the use of its educational resources.

Implications for BYJU’S: As the parent company of WhiteHat Jr, BYJU’S is indirectly implicated in the legal dispute. The outcome of the case may have broader implications for BYJU’S and its subsidiary, potentially affecting their standing within the edtech industry and influencing future collaborations and partnerships.


The legal action taken by against WhiteHat Jr underscores the importance of honoring contractual agreements in the rapidly evolving field of edtech. It also highlights the potential complexities that may arise in collaborations between non-profit organizations and for-profit entities in the education sector. As the case unfolds in the California district court, it will be closely watched to see how it shapes the dynamics of partnerships within the edtech landscape and influences the adherence to contractual obligations.

Leave a comment